To recapitulate the substance of the preceding post, I've determined that the format of the particular type of "crossover story" known as the "monster mashup" takes two broad forms of the "isomyth" and the "allomyth." In this sense myth refers to "the totality of the mythic tropes used in a given narrative," and the characters who are potentially "mashup monsters" conform to one of those two forms. My primary insight in the earlier essay was to establish that every character is used more than once-- one example being the DC monster-character Solomon Grundy-- begins to establish a "narrative myth," a myth not present in characters who only appear in one story.
Now, on THE ARCHIVE, even though I generally use "mythicity" to mean something other than "totality of tropes," I also judge each narrative's mythicity on a "good/fair/poor" spectrum of development. On this blog, with this different but complementary usage of the mythicity-term, I will assert that the two forms of the isomyth and the allomyth further subdivide in "high" and "low" levels for both, because I judge this division to be a good means of distinguishing the "mashup" from the "anti-mashup."
HIGH ISOMTHICITY-- This type of narrative is almost never associated with the "monster mashup," even though the various creatures in the narrative in question may have some significant physical differences between one another. I gave prominent mention to Wells' ISLAND OF DOCTOR MOREAU. All of the monsters in ISLAND are natural animals who have been artificially altered by the mad scientist, and thus, even though each one belonged to a different species originally, now they all share the same "species," having become "of the same species" of the Beast-Men.
At the same time, monsters who actually belong to different species may still be isomythic depending on their context. In the 1933 KING KONG the big ape fights a T-Rex, a pterdodactyl and a giant snake. They're all typical representatives of these fictionalized animal-types, but they lack myths of their own for the same reason as the sparring partners of Gamera: they're intended only to be used as one-shot opponents for a principal monster-character, and so they generate no mythic narratives.
LOW ISOMYTHICITY-- The characters in these narratives also share the same myth-origins, but they APPEAR to look like characters who do not share such origins. In the DOCTOR SPEKTOR story entitled "She Who Summons the Dark Gods," an evil sorceress causes the titular hero to fall into a dream where he encounters doppelgangers of his "real-world" enemies. All of the dream-images of Dracula, Frankenstein Monster et al, share the same origins, but they LOOK LIKE the real creatures of Spektor's world.
In fact, these faux-monsters don't even have to be copies of characters who share the monster-persona. In SCOOBY DOO 2, the Great Dane and his buddies contend with artificially created copies of their old enemies-- none of whom were literal monsters, but rather villains who dressed up as marauding monsters.
LOW ALLOMYTHICITY-- This would apply largely to what I've called a "monster of the month" situation. Godzilla faces a number of one-shot monster-opponents-- Ebirah, Megaguirus, Biolante-- and although they are allomythic in comparison to Godzilla, their stories end in their debut tales, and so they do not sustain their allomyths beyond a low level of intensity.
HIGH ALLOMYTHICITY-- This is the most flexible of the categories. Some characters may stem from separate narratives, as did FRANKENSTEIN MEETS THE WOLF MAN, where both are monsters. But one may also have high allomythicity in a narrative where two or more monster-types appear for the first time against any type of persona, monstrous or not. This is seen in the one-shot film MONSTERS VS, ALIENS, wherein the four heroes are modeled upon four "classic movie monsters," and they join forces to contend against a villainous alien. The reverse also applies in a comic like JUSTICE LEAGUE #45. Here a group of non-monstrous heroes fight not one but two newly debuted monsters, the Shaggy Man and the Moon Creature. Had there been but one new monster, of course, I would have labeled that character just another isomyth. But an allomyth is generated by the interaction of the two monster-types, even though said interaction lasted only for that issue, since to my knowledge the Moon Creature never appeared again, and though the Shaggy Man did, he was just another superhero sparring-partner and didn't cross conceptual paths with any monster-types.
More later...
No comments:
Post a Comment